Saturday, 4 December 2010

Daily Thoughts - BBC Solent

Brrr - it's been a freezing week with lots of snow so I only made it into the studio once - good thing we do pre-records for the earlier broadcast. This time round I was inspired by an ethics course I am doing with each thought based upon a different theory of ethics (although I've simplified somewhat for the radio).

The recordings:

Tuesday 30th November
Wednesday 1st December
Thursday 2nd December
Friday 3rd December

The text versions:

Day 1 – Consequences

The other day I got on the train at Southampton Airport on my way to London and found myself sitting next to a rather nice pair of woolly gloves that a previous passenger had obviously left on the train. I tried them on and they fitted beautifully, and even had a cosy fleece lining on the inside.

If I had been intending to get off the train at Winchester I would have probably thought “what a stroke of luck”, put them in my pocket and enjoyed having warm hands. However, since I was staying on the train quite a lot longer than the ten minutes it take to get to Winchester, I got to thinking why I automatically found it acceptable to just keep a pair of gloves that obviously were not mine.

Perhaps one of the most common ways we make decisions about what is right and what is wrong, is by thinking through the consequences of our actions. In this case the previous owner was unlikely to come looking for their gloves, I wouldn’t exactly get arrested for taking them off the train, no one else would know where I had got them, they were probably only worth £20, and my current pair of gloves had a hole in them and I hadn’t found the time to buy a new pair yet.

But, although all these considerations were quite valid, did they form a good basis for a decision? Are the consequences of our actions all that matter or are there other principles we should be paying attention to? Is it OK to do something merely because I think I can get away with it, or should my sense of right and wrong rest on something deeper?


Day 2 – Principles

In my day job I work as a scientist involved in medical research. Although I don’t get paid quite as much as I might like, an important part of this job for me, is the feeling that I am doing something worthwhile that will probably help other people in the long term.

A particularly critical part of any medical research project is the first time a new medicine is given to humans. This sort of experiment normally happens between five and ten years into a project, and although we have a great deal of information about the new medicine at this point - it’s only when it is finally tested on a person that we get to find out if it causes more good than harm.

As you can probably imagine such experiments are performed very carefully and with close attention paid not only to the medical science aspect, but also to the ethics. Indeed we have to ask ourselves four key ethical questions before proceeding: firstly, are we trying to do good, secondly are we causing any harm, thirdly are we respecting the autonomy (that’s the free choice) of our willing participants, and fourthly are we acting fairly and respecting equality?

Prior to doing medical research I hadn’t really heard about these four principles, but the more I have had to consider them professionally the more I have found them applicable to other areas of my life as well. Time and again, when facing a decision about how to act I find myself asking these four questions - am I trying to do good, am I trying to avoid harm, am I respecting other people and am I acting fairly?

Day 3 – Virtues

What do you think when you hear the words “virtue and vices”? Perhaps some ancient churchy type thing, maybe a Victorian understanding of right and wrong, put surely not something that is applicable to the South Coast of England in the 21st century – are they?

I do think that it is a bit of a shame that words like virtue and vice have drifted out of our everyday vocabulary as they both concern issues that all of us talk (and often gossip) with our friends about almost all the time. “That was so dishonest” we might say or “she’s such a loving mother”, or “he’s so forgiving” or “she’s a hard worker”. You see virtues are simply positive character traits, such as patience, kindness, humility, charity, diligence, hard working or loving. Similarly vices include pride, greed, lust, anger, gluttony, envy or laziness.

The ancient Greek philosopher, Aristotle, was one of the first to come up with this idea of virtues and vices. He was concerned with the question “how is the best way to live?” Instead of focusing on what a person did, he thought it was important to focus on who a person was. His argument was that even in the most difficult or complicated situations, a virtuous person would always do the “right thing” simply because they practiced the virtues on an everyday basis. In other words virtues cannot be switched on or off depending on the situation – they are a constant part of our character and we need to practice them in order to have them!

Day 4 – an ethic of care

Just about two years ago I became a father. Although I obviously knew lots of people with children who tried to warn me what I was getting myself into, I don’t think any amount of psychological preparation could quite prepare me for what was in store once we got our little bundle of joy home from the hospital! I certainly now know what people mean when they say a child gives you the highest highs, but also the lowest lows.
One of my friends, a biologist without children, tells me on the mornings when I struggle into work bleary eyed with calpol and dribble stains on my shirt, that I have evolved to be manipulated by my son in order to pass genes on into the future. He tells me I do not have a choice in the matter, this is just the way biology works. But, although I love biology, and think that biological explanations can be very powerful, I think it’s slightly wide of the mark to say parenting is just about being manipulated by your offspring: there is something incredibly powerful about caring for a child, meeting their needs and seeing them grow, that changes you as a person.

Our western culture seems to encourage people to be individuals, compete with others and use experience and education for self-development, however there are some things that can only be learned when we stop our own lives and start caring for those around us. OK a baby or toddler might be harder to ignore than an older person, friend or work colleague, however caring for others isn’t only about our own personal sacrifice – it changes who we are and how we think, often in a very positive way.

Tuesday, 30 November 2010

Science, Faith, Evolution and Christianity

A forty minute talk I gave at the Institute for Contemporary Christianity last Saturday for the Christians in Science student conference. A bit of a breathless review of the whole subject area including some thoughts on evolution.

The Talk:

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhasek/misc/Science_Faith_Evolution.mp3

The slides are at the following link although the file is quite big so might need a right click and download as (25Mb):

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~rmhasek/misc/StudentConference2010.pdf

Thursday, 11 November 2010

Friday, 13 August 2010

Friday 13th daily thoughts from BBC Radio solent

It's quite fun being in the studio four mornings in a row reading the daily thoughts out live. Julian Clegg is an impressive DJ to watch in action - seeming to be able to talk whilst reading the next item and sounding laid back despite the often chaotic scenes in the studio around him. I get about ten seconds to talk to him during the jingles and then thats it - I'm in and out!

Todays thought can be heard here.

Day 4: 

Good morning. 

In my final thought this week, inspired by the book “life of Pi”, I want to dwell on a comment made by the heroes dad when they are busy selling all the animals in their zoo, ready to emigrate from India to Canada. Being a good zoo-keeper the father is keen that all the animals go to a good home, and ruefully muses that the greater good and the greater profit are not always compatible aims. 

I was really struck by this comment especially in a time of financial austerity when everything we hear in the news is about cutting services, stopping building projects, reducing pensions and people losing jobs. Yes of course we need companies and an economy that is sustainable, however sometimes we should ask whether it is actually pursuing the “greater good” to put balance sheets before the needs of people, especially in organisations such as government whose whole purpose is to serve and look after society. Is it actually pursuing the greater good to have an economy that is bigger and better than everyone elses, or should we sometimes temper our ambitions by remembering that the greater profit and the greater good are not the same thing? 

Similarly on a personal level, once we have achieved a standard of living that meets our basic needs, should we now stop and consider how our extra time and resources are spent? Do we just look for “more, better, now” or do we try to enjoy life and perhaps even make a difference? If the greater good and the greater profit are not always compatible, which of the two are we pursuing?

Daily thoughts day 3 (August)

Listen here or read:

Day 3: 

Good morning. 

In the book “life of Pi” the main character is stranded on a life-boat for many months. He comes to realise what his needs in life really are, and what aspects of his previous life were in fact luxuries. It is quite amazing to read an account like this and think quite how few things we really need, and indeed how many of our “essential” possessions are in fact luxuries. 

Let me give an example - recently a new electronics store opened around the corner from where I live so I went for a visit to check it out. This turned into a bit of a mistake as it was a “sale” weekend and everyone seemed to be fighting to get to the TV section and bag the “bargain” offers. I couldn’t help but be drawn to the offers section and start laying extravagant plans for a home cinema – an apparent “need” in my life that I hadn’t previously recognised. I went home and spent all night dreaming about the cinema system, and worrying how I could afford it, or indeed fit it into my sitting room. However, after spending a night tossing and turning all my great plans were quickly squashed by my wife who reminded me that a home cinema was not a basic need, and indeed not even an option! 

So here’s my thought for the day – once we have enough resources to meet the really basic needs, do we realise that any extra money or time can be used to make us happy, or do we automatically begin to look around, decide on greater “needs”, and then get stressed about trying to afford them? Do we use our extra resources to bring happiness, or simply more stress?

Julian Clegg show, BBC radio solent

Daily thoughts day 2 - listen here or text below:

Day 2 

Good morning. 

This weeks daily thoughts are motivated by the Man Booker prize winning novel “Life of Pi”. 

In one part of this book the teenage main character, Pi, manages to simultaneously become a Christian, a Hindu and a Muslim. He happily attends a church, temple and a mosque for a number of months until people start to notice and object to his multi-faith religion. This leads to a showdown involving his parents, a priest, a pandit and an imam. The adults decide that he has to choose one of the three religions, but Pi doesn’t understand - “if people can have more than one different passport why can’t they have more than one religion?” he asks? Pi’s dilemma is perhaps made worse by this part of the novel being set in India at a time when choice of religion could often mean the difference between life or death. 

Of course historically the choice of religion was based on geography and family tradition. However today we live in an increasingly globalised and multi-cultural society where people of widely differing religions mix on an every day basis. So is it a valid thing to just become a member of all religions? 

I don’t think it is because there is an important difference between respecting people of other religions, and what a person privately believes. The power of each religion is in its ability to provide a coherent picture of the world, providing a framework for ethics and behaviour. If we start to combine traditions we will unavoidably run into conflicts. Of course we should always respect and work with people of other religions, however if someone wants to explore spirituality it is probably best not to create our own religion, but rather choose a tradition and follow the wisdom of history.

Daily Thoughts - August - BBC radio solent

More daily thoughts! Recording can be found by clicking here. Text below:

Day 1

Good Morning.

This week’s daily thoughts are based upon the book “life of Pi”. I won’t spoil the story because I don’t think I can - I couldn’t possibly give an adequate description of this bizarre but brilliant recipient of the 2002 Man Booker prize. However, something that I can relate are some of the fascinating side-tracks that spur the reader to stop and think more carefully about themselves and how they see life.

Towards the beginning of the book the central character, “Pi”, describes the fictional zoo that he was brought up in. Although not defending zoo’s per se, he does point out that it is a mistake to equate animals freedom in the wild with happiness, and think that zoos make animals unhappy. In actual fact animals in the wild have a tough time - living lives of compulsion and necessity in an environment low on food but high in fear, disease and sudden death. They often have to be quite reactionary because the smallest changes in their environment could signify the approach of a predator or the onset of a debilitating disease. Animals are therefore happiest in a predictable environment where their needs can be met relatively easily - a situation that can often be achieved quite successfully in a zoo. 

However, if zoo animals are unhappy, or try to escape from their enclosure, they are seldom trying to escape to somewhere, but more likely running from something. A good zoo-keeper knows that the solution to an unhappy animal is not to move it somewhere else, but rather look for what is specifically upsetting it, and see if this can be changed. Escape is often a quick reaction, not a long-term solution.

Monday, 26 July 2010

Julian's People - BBC Radio Solent August

Did another short Julian's People interview today. On listening back it sounds like a bit of a moan, however perhaps reflects the dismal failure I have had so far this year trying to get a fellowship grant or lectureship position. Hopefully I will be able to be more upbeat next time I do one of these!

Click here to listen!

Monday, 7 June 2010

More BBC radio!

Another 4 minute interview about my research recorded live for BBC radio Solent.

Click here!

Thursday, 1 April 2010

Radio Interview

BBC Radio Solent does a slot called "Julian's People" at ten to seven during the week where they interview someone who is "trying to achieve" something over the course of a year or so. They have decided to follow me as I apply for lectureships and fellowship grants. The first interview is on the link here.